This can be stood out from SAS, which has a BER of 1 perused piece blunder in each 10 Quadrillion. Going by these figures, the last innovation is multiple times more solid than the other two, which is very critical when you consider that each perused blunder is information lost.
SAS is likewise better than SATA and Close to Line SAS in that it performs altogether better because of higher RPM paces of 10k and 15k, contrasted and the other two’s utilization of just 7200 RPM. SAS additionally flaunts a great typical look for season of 3.5 milliseconds, contrasted and 9.5 milliseconds with regards to SATA or Close to Line SAS.
Leave a Reply